TwoNav 4.9.5

Follow

Comments

3 comments

  • Avatar
    Jacek Rydecki

    1. When the gps connections will be improved - it takes a long time, even if I only set the GPS (no Glonas, Galileo). Anima + does this immediately, even indoors. I have some videos showing this problem.

    Video1: https://youtu.be/u0pDIcwwfzY

    Video2: https://youtu.be/xDIWh5N6QAs

    2. Cross The map rotation does not work smoothly, reacts poorly to course changes, with a very large lag. Anima + works very smoothly. I have a video comparison.

    Video1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVgQI-l9J_Q

    3. Unable to set the volume, only ON / OFF, the rest hidden deep in the settings.
    4. Inability to turn on and off the backlight, only brighter and darker. It would save the battery like Anima + had
    5. Original handles hold poorly, age-old problem. I've already lost one Anima + device.

    6. Tomorrow I will check if the ANT + sensor connections are finally working because they were disconnecting or could not be connected.

    If Anima had a better display and a smaller menu, the old device would work much faster and smoother.

    Best Regards Jacek R.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    RONEN GROPER

    Strongly agree with 1 + 2 ! also have the same issue's

     
    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Jacek Rydecki

    It is unacceptable for a newer device to run slower.
    It is said to have a better chipset, a newer GPS module, glonas, galileo, it should have a faster processor. What do we get? Slower navigation device, problem and very long waiting time for satellite signal connections.
    The difference in devices is over 3-4 years. There should be a breakthrough.
    I am deeply disappointed. and I want to advertise it because waiting for satellite signal connections is cumbersome and the quality of navigation on the trail during races is delayed and does not run smoothly.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Article is closed for comments.