Dubious Pending approval "feature"
Some of my posts got stuck in the "Pending approval" line (some for years). There is no apparent reason visible why some post go through without hassle and some not. I'm now considering to leave this "forum" forever. Whoever programmed this crap should be sentenced to listen "please hold the line" the next years continuously.
Cheers
-
Hello,
In general, messages are blocked when there is a suspicion that an address or a link to the internet is being shared.
That’s what I’ve noticed.
The "thing" that controls this seems to have some trouble with syntax.
TwoNav has just updated Land 11, TwoNav 6, and Link; things seem to be going better now than they were a few months ago. There are still some minor points to criticize, but this time they appear to be marginal.
Regarding the recent discussions about the visual appearance of the OSM map: it seems TwoNav has modified the data layer structure, grouping them into thematic overlays (which is a good idea). However, the layer names haven't really changed; the old ambiguities persist, and some confusion remains (for instance, between the nature of a building and its intended purpose). This overhaul began with Land 10—which was quite a mess—and, from what I can see, there are still some visual flaws in how Land organizes these displayed layers. That said, the *.clay file created via Land 11 works correctly and is recognized by both Land 11 and the GPS device; older *.clay files work as well. The only thing missing is the *.mpvf format, which is still listed as a supported feature in the PRO version.
Best Regards
-
I’ve had the same problem as Uwe with posts in my Terra thread. The first time, I contacted the TwoNav team, and they added the post for me. Now, I have another post that hasn’t been approved (Charles, it was a reply to your comment). I find this requirement to wait for approval incomprehensible and disrespectful toward me. For now, I’ve abandoned the idea of buying a TwoNav device.
-
TwoNav has just updated Land 11, TwoNav 6, and Link; things seem to be going better now than they were a few months ago. There are still some minor points to criticize, but this time they appear to be marginal.
That is something I agree with you. What I can see is a steady positiv development in the device software as in the Land software too. With the exception of the price tag! The pro feature are way to expensive, especially if you want to use it mainly for map creation and you compare it to the last almost bugfree version 8.97 (regarding map creation). If we leave mbtiles support out there was no significant development in this section and for instance we still don't have adress search in the created OSM maps.
-
Hello,
The issue mentioned only affects the user-to-user communication page; in my experience, it does not affect the function for sending requests.
This "flaw" can be easily bypassed by re-drafting the text, which suggests that a content-verification feature is the cause.
It is inconvenient, as one must verify that the message has actually been sent after drafting it, but it is not a serious problem.
As UWE.B points out, I also notice real improvements following the release of recent updates. This suggests a renewed sense of momentum at TwoNav—a notion further supported by information that leaked during a major recent mountain biking event held on the Mediterranean coast.
Best regards
Vous devez vous connecter pour laisser un commentaire.
Commentaires
7 commentaires